Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 23:51

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Oldest human DNA ever found tells the story of a lost branch on the human family tree - Earth.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Who is the dumbest law enforcement officer you have ever encountered?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Here's How Much Traders Expect Apple Stock to Move After WWDC - Investopedia
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How likely is it to make a living out of being a window cleaner in a Nordic country?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What do you do to make yourself sleep early?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Changing one gene can restore some tissue regeneration to mice - Ars Technica